• Hondolor
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Evolution is a fact, the real argument is actually biogenesis. Did life originate from a soup, or was it all part of a grand design.

    The old argument, is that the complexity of life is so great that it isn’t reasonable to believe that it could have happen naturally. Although realistically, there’s no true scientific way to prove it did or didn’t. It’s all theory

    • AgreeableLandscapeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I think Occam’s Razor would apply in that case. And the secular theory requires fewer assumptions.

      • Hondolor
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Personally I don’t think so, to me life looks to rigidly structured to be random. Too complex, too many if’s in the way the Earth has to be just right. MAYBE it could be random but design actually seems more likely to me. Then again, though, people shape there world view to better fit around there personal identities. No one is without bias in that.