When Meta launched their new Twitter competitor Threads on July 5, they said that it would be compatible with the ActivityPub protocol, Mastodon, and all the other decentralized social networks in the fediverse “soon”.

But on July 14, @alexeheath of the Verge reported that Meta’s saying ActivityPub integration’s “a long way out”. Hey wait a second. Make up your mind already!

From the perspective of the “free fediverse” that’s not welcoming Meta, the new positioning that ActivityPub integration is “a long way out” is encouraging. OK, it’s not as good as “when hell freezes over,” but it’s a heckuva lot better than “soon.” In fact, I’d go so far as to say “a long way out” is a clear victory for the free fediverse’s cause.

  • HughJanus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t consider that a victory at all. Meta could bring the Fediverse to the masses. And allow anyone to follow and interact with their friends on Threads.

    • pazukaza
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do we need to bring the fediverse to the masses though?

      • Deliverance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because social media, by definition, only works when “the masses” use it. I don’t just want to interact with the fellow nerds currently on the Fediverse, I want decentralized social media to be the norm.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So that…people will use it?

        I mean the whole purpose of social media is to interact with others.

        Maybe you prefer spending your time interacting with strangers. There was once a time when social media was actually about networking with friends and family and people you otherwise actually knew. That’s why I joined.

        Also to get more people AWAY from the tech giants and basically reimagine advertising and business as we know it.

        I mean really it’s good for everyone who’s not a conglomerate tech company.

        • pazukaza
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hm, so you’re giving a new API free of charge to all the AI tech giants in the era of AI. How is this bad for them?

          • HughJanus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            …because people will realize there are better platforms without privacy violations and ads where they can still interact with their friends and transition.

            Like Mastodon and others have basically all of the benefits and none of the drawbacks.

            • pazukaza
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Without ads YET. Once the “masses” arrive, donations are no longer an option.

              • HughJanus
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I mean they could try it but people would just migrate to a different server so there would be no point.

                The main Mastodon instance has 1.5M users and no ads.

                • pazukaza
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Is 1.5M users “the masses” to you? Reddit has like 400M active users monthly. That’s the scale I’m talking about.

                  Registered users is a very bad metric too.

                  • HughJanus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    It’s 1.5M users on a single server. There are literally thousands of servers.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is this terrible gatekeeping mentality? We want more content, and we want more people to have freedom. Everyone deserves privacy and decentralization. This gatekeeping is toxic and conservative in nature.

        • esaru@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Let’s start with Facebook first, the platform that made a walled garden out of

          • messengers (went from XMPP to walled garden)
          • websites (businesses having facebook pages rather than freely accessible websites)
          • used product markets
          • online communities
          • email (sending email to a Facebook user is converted into a private message on Facebook rather than sending out the email, at least that was a thing in the past)
          • … (insert any Facebook service here)

          You can’t trust Facebook, it’s about turning its users into a product for marketers, and that’s it.