• Cowbee [he/they]OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Using it as an insult is homophobic. Doing it for pleasure is the opposite (assuming both pariticipants are men).

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I understand how it could be insulting as a command. “Go suck a dick” implies that it’s an undesirable activity to be used as punishment.

      I don’t understand the homophobia in using sucking dick like kissing ass, swinging from their nuts, or cucking. They are interchangeable in both context and sexuality.

      • Cowbee [he/they]OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Again, the root is that performing sexual favors for someone you are supporting or defending is in shame. The source of this shame, is that society sees such an action in a negative light. If you say someone supporting someone is sucking them off, it implies that they are taking a shameful action that if discovered they would be embarrassed.

        It weaponizes society’s homophobia to silence others. On top of being rude, it’s based in misogyny and homophobia.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          How is it homophobic if someone told me, a straight man, that I’m kissing a woman’s ass? How do you even know my sexual preference in the first place?

          I could understand claims of sexism in general, but homophobia is not all-encompassing to your point of shame.

          • Cowbee [he/they]OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It wouldn’t be homophobic to claim you were kissing a woman’s ass. It would still be rooted in sexual shame, which has misognyistic roots. I told you quite plainly that I openly display my pronouns and am a pansexual man, saying I am sucking someone’s dick is homophobic in this case.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              So the only way to use a sexually charged analogy for sidling without being homophobic is to ensure the sexual act differed from the subject’s sexual preference if they’re homosexual, bisexual, or pansexual, but aligned with their sexual preference if they’re heterosexual?

              Also, I thought pronouns only assisted in determining gender. How could I know your sexual preference simply by knowing your gender?

              I’m pretty sure you’re asking for more awareness and consideration than most people are willing to provide.

              • Cowbee [he/they]OP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                That gets rid of the bulk of the homophobia, technically, but the basis is typically rooted in misogyny regardless and using sexually charged analogies as sources of shame in general should be avoided. I’m not asking for awareness, I’m asking that insults be purely related to the topic at hand and not based on immutable characteristics. Notice how I brushed aside accusations of being a “tankie?” Such an insult is silly, but doesn’t assert sexual shame.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I mean, your opinion is fair. I’m just struggling to comprehend how to simply position the change in a way that is both clear and equitable.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    It’s a very common insult, so it’s difficult to address directly. When analyzing an insult, you have to analyze why it’s insulting. Why is it that sexual acts based on service specifically are common? Because the service aspect is primary. They specifically didn’t say I was “railing Castro” or anything, such an accusation implies dominance and manliness, in a way, while being submissive is shameful. It brings to mind the historical treatment of women as subservient to men, and the historical classification of homosexual men as “feminized.”

                    Consider it this way: why would someone not want to be accused of sucking someone off, vs being accused of being a loyal dog? Where is the distinction? The latter focuses on dehumanization, the former focuses on sexual hierarchy, misogyny, and homophobia.