It’s my, general, understanding that most people connect to the Internet through mobile apps.

If this is the case, then why have apps such as Remmel, Lemmur and jerboa taken a back seat?

IMHO, it would be a mistake to market Lemmy without these mobile apps functioning properly.

I have forked the three aforementioned mobile apps here and will try to ‘drum up’ support from developers wherever I can find them.

Please, if you don’t feel comfortable talking to me about this here, then send me a private message. Thank you.

  • @suspendedOP
    0•2 years ago

    mobile websites

    Are you referring to websites that are mobile responsive?

    Maybe, there are developers out there that could make a mobile app experience ‘different’ than the browser experience. I believe there are.

    • @adrianmalacoda
      7•2 years ago

      In my experience, the main reason mobile websites suck is because they do so by design, in order to push users to install an app. Lemmy developers have no incentive to do so.

      • @poVoq
        8•1 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • Preston Maness ☭
      4•2 years ago

      Are you referring to websites that are mobile responsive?

      Yes. My general philosophy is that, if it can be done in the browser, then it shouldn’t need an app. Leave mobile apps to the cases where the browser can’t get the job done.

      • @suspendedOP
        3•2 years ago

        Using Lemmy on a smart phone with a browser should work fine since the site is built to be responsive. However, having a native Lemmy application for Android and iOS could provide opportunities for further feature development that isn’t included with the browser version. That is why I believe it is a good idea to keep these apps going.

        • erpicht
          2•2 years ago

          What is the point of adding exclusive features to the mobile application? What sort of features should these be? Purely cosmetic?