• Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I recently saw a video on it, saying that it’s true, but in tge context of US politics
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWy8EEqXbBg

      As an outsider looking at America, the vid makes sense. I saw some comments on the net say that RW Trump was the first US president to go to Nk and meet Kim rather than some LW one. I don’t know whether the meetings were useful tho

      • TheOubliette
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        US politics has no left. It only exists as very small groups that, when they start having influence, get shut down by the feds. That video is super slow so I only watched 15 minutes but I would guess they are referring to a rejection of liberalism emerging from degrading material conditions being the main force of peeling off a left and right, and thus there us a similarity. Is that about right?

        • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yep. It says that the mainstream left n right in the US is pro-ruling class, with only minor differences and they get entangled around only entry-level topics without going after the materials reasons for issues n solving them.

          I think they mean the democrats, with the term to mean the US mainstream ‘left’. The video criticises both the Left and Right under that definition.

          • TheOubliette
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh I see. I think I guessed wrong then. So they mean the mainstream left and right are both liberals, they are of the ideology of capitalism and therefore very similar, primarily defining themselves through shibboleths that are not really about commitments to policy or political action.