MADRID, Oct 13 (Reuters) - The 15th-century explorer Christopher Columbus was a Sephardic Jew from Western Europe, Spanish scientists said on Saturday, after using DNA analysis to tackle a centuries-old mystery.

Several countries have argued over the origins and the final burial place of the divisive figure who led Spanish-funded expeditions from the 1490s onward, opening the way for the European conquest of the Americas.

Many historians have questioned the traditional theory that Columbus came from Genoa, Italy. Other theories range from him being a Spanish Jew or a Greek, to Basque, Portuguese or British.

To solve the mystery researchers conducted a 22-year investigation, led by forensic expert Miguel Lorente, by testing tiny samples of remains buried in Seville Cathedral, long marked by authorities there as the last resting place of Columbus, though there had been rival claims.

They compared them with those of known relatives and descendants and their findings were announced in a documentary titled “Columbus DNA: The true origin” on Spain’s national broadcaster TVE on Saturday. “We have DNA from Christopher Columbus, very partial, but sufficient. We have DNA from Hernando Colón, his son,” Lorente said in the programme.

    • wellfill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Guess. Also how did you infer from the article that ONLY jews were blamed?

      • CyberMonkey404
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Guess

        No. This isn’t a quiz show. You have something to say - say it. Own up to your beliefs.

        ONLY jews were blamed

        True, it’s not only Jews. Used to be it got blamed on Spaniards, catholics, some nebulous “whites”. Anything other than class. Can never say out loud that part

        • wellfill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m sorry you seem quite misinformed. 1. By predenting not to know which natives I’m talking about. 2. By having issues with blaming also catholics for colonialism? If you have not studied the matter perhaps don’t show your lack of knowledge. Christianity and colonialism by Howitt is mentioned by Marx in capital. Howitt begins by noting that it was primarily papal bull, which in the eyes of catholics legitimized the division of america. It stole the land from under the natives. Then he goes to describe individual colonies, and the treatment of natives. Good read.

          • CyberMonkey404
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I forgot more than you’ll ever know, little wannabe troll

            • wellfill
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sophism 101. Do you have anything referring to what I presented?