Famous AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions of Dollars From People Stealing His Work
gizmodo.com
The guy who used Midjourney to create an award-winning piece of AI art demands copyright protections.

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

“But I still want to get paid for it.”

  • cecinestpasunbotEnglish
    6·
    2 months ago

    Who are you arguing against? I never said AI was analogous to a human brain. It’s plainly not.

    • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
      7·
      2 months ago

      here?

      Unfortunately I think that’s a bit of a liberal argument. It ascribes some ineffable quality to human creativity that AI cannot replicate.

      unless my lying eyes deceive me

      • cecinestpasunbotEnglish
        6·
        2 months ago

        When I say replicate I mean replicate an output. I.e. AI can be used to create images that are unique but categorically indistinguishable from various types of digital images that we would classify as art. I did not mean to imply that the AI models which currently exist can replicate processes that occur in the human mind.

        I understand why there might be some confusion and I’m sorry if I wasn’t more clear. I genuinely dislike calling these models “neural nets” or “AI” because that implies they function as a human mind would. Anyone who understands the basics of both should know that’s not at all true.