• Cowbee [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s completely meaningless, actual positions and ideologies are the only way to actually measure.

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It really doesn’t, though. Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space, what matters is literal positions and stances.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space

          Not completely. If two people occupy a similar space, it means they agreed on something. That is meaningful. It’s vague, sure. But it isn’t completely random nonsense like astrology.

          • Cowbee [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out, occupying the same space as someone with a “neutral” view. It’s worthless.

            Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality.

            • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out,

              Only if the person with a left view also has a right view. And only if the other person with the right view has a left view.

              You seem confused. The point of it isn’t to give a fully accurate explanation of a person’s views on every topic. It’s to give somebody a general idea.

              Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality.

              All political measurements fall victim to that. It’s a moot point. But just because some people are like that doesn’t mean everyone is.

              • Cowbee [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                You seem confused. The point of it isn’t to give a fully accurate explanation of a person’s views on every topic. It’s to give somebody a general idea.

                It doesn’t, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports.