• Cowbee [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Removing legitimacy from the system itself, and forcing the DNC to appeal to the left if they wish to gain more votes, rather than allow them to get away with genocide.

    • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The same DNC that blamed the left for Hillary losing and then credited centrism with Biden winning?

      Those are fine goals, but pragmatism involves addressing reality as it is, not how you would like it to be. I doubt you can achieve both removing legitimacy from the system as you see it and forcing the DNC to speak to the left simultaneously since the DNC is a part of the system that’s in place. Unfortunately the DNC appealing to the left needs to be a two way street, make the left more appealing to the DNC than the right. All those Republicans endorsing Harris is the right appealing to the DNC, the left needs to out do that effort to pull the DNC to the left. Rejecting them won’t do that, only the opposite.

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The same DNC that blamed the left for Hillary losing and then credited centrism with Biden winning?

        Yes. They can continue to blame, but they will continue to lose.

        Those are fine goals, but pragmatism involves addressing reality as it is, not how you would like it to be. I doubt you can achieve both removing legitimacy from the system as you see it and forcing the DNC to speak to the left simultaneously since the DNC is a part of the system that’s in place. Unfortunately the DNC appealing to the left needs to be a two way street, make the left more appealing to the DNC than the right. All those Republicans endorsing Harris is the right appealing to the DNC, the left needs to out do that effort to pull the DNC to the left. Rejecting them won’t do that, only the opposite.

        This is peak liberalism, lmao. The DNC is pulling right because of their donors, if they think they can win without the left then that is their miscalculation.

        • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Lol, yes. There are metaphorical carrots pulling the DNC to the right, I think we agree there. Now if you want to be “pragmatic” about it will a metaphorical stick from the left move them more left, or more right given the way we can see they calculate?

          • Cowbee [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a carrot, not a stick, but either way electoralism won’t save anyone.

                • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Not in those words

                  I’m voting both pragmatically and with my conscience by voting for Claudia De La Crúz.

                  With the goal of

                  Removing legitimacy from the system itself, and forcing the DNC to appeal to the left

                  Is that not good? Or is it not real?

                  Or maybe it won’t have that effect? Because that’s an idealistic plan, not a pragmatic one

                  • Cowbee [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It’s a minor effect, equivalent to signal boosting a good message. My single vote isn’t going to do jack shit in the grand scheme of things, organizing will.