• verdigris
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s why they did it in sets of three. They could just give every user a blank text box for every option, but doing it this way makes it far easier to analyze the data in bulk.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      yea, but that gives you less info

      this way, you can’t really differentiate from a feature that people want, but not as a priority, VS a feature that people don’t want ever

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        And there’s no way to relate preference between features, at least in my case. I had one question that I entered “2x faster performance” as most want, and the next question was “2x slower performance,” but there was another crappy option in the same list that I also don’t want, so if I don’t pick “2x slower performance” as least want, what signal does that send?

        I hope it all comes out in the wash, but honestly, I would’ve preferred a big list of all of the features with 4 options:

        • really want
        • want
        • meh
        • don’t want

        I think I would’ve entered about even numbers of things for each category. They could even limit “really want” to top three or something.