• CyberMonkey404
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    What was their reasoning for not punishing the guy? I haven’t heard about that yet. And frankly a year for rape also sounds anomalous

    • friendlymessage@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Under Dutch law, pressuring a 12 year old into having sex repeatedly (3 times in 2 days) is fornication, not rape. Not making this up, that’s actually their reasoning.

      To be fair, of course Durch authorities did not ignore that he was in prison in the UK, so they did not say one month is enough, but 13 months.

      • CyberMonkey404
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        How tf?! Thank you for the information, this is somehow even dumber than I thought

        • TimoBRL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          To be clear. I’m not defending a rapist. There is some nuance though. The guy was 19 and she said she was 16. They’d been chatting for months, and he flew to the UK for her, believing they were in some sort of relationship. He found out her true age after this.

          Was he being naive thinking it’d be alright. Oh yes. Is it still wrong? Definitely. Should be have been punished? Yep.

          Is he a pedophile because he had sex with a girl he was in love with and should he be punished for the rest of his life? You tell me.