• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 个月前

      Again, China does not run the company, they just own the leash on the private entrepreneurs who do. That’s one of Deng’s benefits for implementing capitalism. (mildlyinteresting: the word capitalism isn’t capitalized)

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 个月前

        China has a massive stake in the company. It’s a huge investment for them. Hardly “free”

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 个月前

          It’s a one-time fee that also earns money back compared to the continuous payments to buy from other sources.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 个月前

            Assuming China doesn’t have to spend literally any other money, even though countries are constantly investing in infrastructure and security and material to assist the business.

            But also, literally not free. My point stands.

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 个月前

              You won’t just stop the maintenance if TikTok didn’t exist. It’s not like all China cares about is data.

              Your question was “why would China get data from TikTok when they can just buy it from Meta”. If China didn’t get the data from ByteDance, ByteDance still incurs the maintenance fee. So no, that is not the expense of getting the data.