Noah had 2 of each species in individual, appropriately salted fishbowls in his ark, duh
Noah had 2 of each species in individual, appropriately salted fishbowls in his ark, duh
Dumb question I’m too lazy to Google - who decides the wording for these questions? It seems like it’s always Republicans, no matter who is proposing the question
Not that I know of - this was a one-off for the game.
I made a video game for these guys a while back. Check it out: https://www.howlinggiant.com/comet-rider-video-game
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
So many sandwiches ruined by the author’s weird obsession with mayo
Why not get rid of delegates altogether while we’re at it?
deleted by creator
No risk. Godot is distributed under the MIT license. If the foundation does something shady, you’re free to clone the entire engine, name it “Frodot”, and continue to add features to your own version.
Exporting to other platforms like Xbox, Nintendo Switch depend on some additional infrastructure, so the same may not apply.
Oh man, the "quick call?"s are the worst
https://github.com/Vencord/Vesktop
I’ve recently started using this (recompiled with better icons), it seems to work pretty well.
I am not familiar with the feature you’re using, but an “expression” is just some code that evaluates to a value; in other words, it’s the right side of the equals sign.
As a Wisconsinite, I’ve always been confused why it’s considered “midwest”. Wisconsin is in the eastern half of the US, and at the very top. Should be called the “midnorth”
Flint Flossy has so many smangers. My faves are:
Did I mention I like to dance?
Taste you like yogurt
Fried or fertilized
I’ve been using Lawnchair for a few years with no complaints. It’s basically the pixel launcher with extra features.
Better spiders than mice
I probably did a poor job of summarizing, as I’m not a lawyer; here’s the key quote from the article:
That doesn’t mean that it will be easy for the Special Counsel to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump had the requisite mental state to violate the law. It means that his actions plausibly violate the law.
My point was that contrary to the previous commenter’s implication that anyone telling you to watch out for lies is just going to feed you their own propaganda, this article is fairly objective.
I think in this case it’s a pretty fair post - tl;dr: the blogger doesn’t offer a view on whether or not Trump broke the law, only that his actions could plausibly be illegal based on the sections of the constitution used to prosecute him, and that it’s not an obvious win for the prosecutors as it depends on the state of mind that led to the actions.
We started around 2.5 years, and followed the “Oh Crap!” potty training book. We went straight from diapers to nothing (no pull ups, even at night), and it took less than a week. The idea is to take a few days off where you can watch them constantly, go without pants, and catch their “cues” right before they go and run them to the potty. Once they are doing that consistently (usually after a day or so), add pants and repeat, but give them a chance to decide to go themselves. They won’t want to go in their pants/on the floor. More than 1 or 2 accidents, go back to day one.
Sounds like you’re close, but just need to be consistent and maybe do a bit of a reset, to make it clear that going in the potty isn’t an optional, once in a while thing, but the only option going forward. Not sure about your day care situation, but the book recommends against pull ups as it feels just like a diaper, and makes it hard to be consistent.