Lucky

The project I’m on right now originally had the nuget.exe saved in source because they had to manually run it through build scripts, it wasn’t built in to VS until VS2012

I’m guessing they only used it 10 years ago when it was very rough around the edges. It didn’t integrate well with the old .NET Framework because it conflicted with how web.config managed dependencies and poor integration with VS. It was quite bad back then… but so was .NET Framework in general. Then they rebuilt from the ground up with dotnet core and it’s been rock solid since

Or they just hate Microsoft, which is a common motif to shit on anything Microsoft does regardless of the actual product.

I’ve never had an issue with nuget, at least since dotnet core. My experience has it far ahead of npm and pip

Seems they have PWAs, here’s a guide by Mozilla for installing them on Firefox

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web_apps/Guides/Installing

deleted by creator

Well, in context of “the Nazis have taken over and our only option is a military operation to remove the government”, I highly doubt the Nazis would allow a Jewish person to be elected as president in the first place. If they don’t have that ability then they clearly don’t have enough power to justify a foreign invasion

If they were serious about stopping Nazis maybe they should have started with Dmitry Utkin who has Nazi tattoos and literally named the state-funded Wagner group after Hitler’s favorite composer.

It’s almost like this has never been about stopping Nazis at all

Could it be the openly communist site using inflammatory language to bash an ideological opponent? No, it must be racism

President Zelenskyy is from a Ukrainian Jewish family. At the start of the war Russia claimed Ukraine was taken over by Nazis and they were trying to liberate the country. It was a ridiculous claim and they had to come up with other justifications afterwards

That’s a fair argument to make

Removed by mod

Well we can play “what if” all we want, but bringing it back to the main point of Sanders, you can argue all you want about if it was the correct course of action but his vote was to stop an invading force.

This source seems completely unbiased and trustworthy.

I’m wondering if you just posted the link without reading any results and are just doubling down to sound correct.

One of the first articles is AP news reporting UN backed human rights groups calling it genocide

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-human-rights-663b3a4ba24499d93f3f889e98f8b652

And an article by Time reporting the kidnapping of children being investigated as genocide, and that there is already enough evidence for the allegations

https://time.com/6262903/russia-ukraine-genocide-war-crimes/

The intervention was a key reason the war ended after multiple years of conflict and ethnic cleansing. Are you saying that ending the war caused more ethnic cleansing afterwards than was already happening? That ending war made things less stable?

It’s been widely reported by numerous nations and organizations. Search for “Russian genocide Ukraine” and you’ll see plenty of credible sources

Yugoslavia was invading Kosovo and commiting ethnic cleansing of Albanians at the time. Agree or disagree with how it was executed, it fits with the idea that he opposes the aggressors in war

There are a number of alloys that are used when working with desalinization plants, but the effective ones are cost prohibitive.

Even if they had a way of pumping it out cheaper, it still comes with issues that are costly. There are chemicals used during the process which pollute the brine and cost money to remove. It also comes out much warmer than surrounding water which disrupts the ecosystem. The brine eats up oxygen levels and suffocates animal life in the area.

They are trying to dilute the brine before releasing it back to the ocean but this is either not effective enough since you’re using salt water from the same source you’re pumping into, especially if the area doesn’t have strong currents to carry it away. Or you’re using water which doesn’t have high salt levels and can dilute it to healthy levels, which you might as well just treat and use in the first place instead of using saltwater.

It’s not an easy problem to solve at the moment

I’d be concerned about it leaching into the water table with that approach. Plus transport to those mines could be very expensive and complicated

Salt is highly corrosive, especially when concentrated into a slurry. If you dump it directly from shore you kill any local wildlife and destroy the local area before it dilutes. If you pipe it further out into the ocean the pipe will continually need maintenance due to corrosion and makes it more expensive

If you dump it on land you also need to ensure it isn’t exposed to wind which will kick it up and cause health hazards to local populations. So you can bury it, but that doesn’t scale and adds to the costs