Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.

Spent many years on Reddit and is now exploring new vistas in social media.

  • 0 Posts
  • 3.04K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle













  • FaceDeer@kbin.socialtoTechnologyGitHub Is Not Open Source, A Rant
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So we’ve moved from “GitHub is not open source” to “GitHub has some support software for peripheral features that is not open-source?” I’m definitely failing to see the rant-worthiness of it at this point. It’s certainly not monopolistic, platforms like GitLab and Bitbucket also provide these features. And I’d bet that some of them have their own proprietary software to support these things too.


  • FaceDeer@kbin.socialtoTechnologyGitHub Is Not Open Source, A Rant
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s quite a series of leaps of logic here.

    Because Google (not Microsoft) released a project under the BSD license (an open source license) but “everyone on Lemmy” doesn’t think it’s open source, therefore a hosting site owned by Microsoft (not Google) is not “open source.”

    I’m not even sure what is meant by GitHub being “open source.” It’s a hosting provider, not an actual piece of software. The site itself doesn’t have a source license. The individual repositories can have licenses, which can be whatever the user who created the repository sets it to be - including open source licenses. Do you mean GitHub Desktop? Microsoft released that under the MIT license. And you don’t need GitHub Desktop to use GitHub anyway.