F_Haxhausen@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoYummy Mummylemmy.worldimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1713arrow-down123
arrow-up1690arrow-down1imageYummy Mummylemmy.worldF_Haxhausen@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·edit-21 year agoI think mm/dd/yyyy is better than dd/mm/yyyy, because you can sort by the first number and the dates will be in chronological order (though I agree with the below comment that YYYY MM DD is the best).
I think mm/dd/yyyy is better than dd/mm/yyyy, because you can sort by the first number and the dates will be in chronological order (though I agree with the below comment that YYYY MM DD is the best).