1.“Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception.”

2.“Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions.”

3.“Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it.”

4.“This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored.”

5.“To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing.”

6.“Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified.”

7.“Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties.”

8.“Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels.”

9.“Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags.”

10.“In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment.”

11.“The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration.”

12.“A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions.”

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            39
            ·
            11 months ago

            My bad. The communists started the repressions and famines of imperial japanese rule? Or do you mean the repressions and constant famines under british colonial regime? Or do you mean the repressions and constant famine under the Kuomintang? Or do you mean the repressions and famines of Qing China? Which of these do you mean it was that the communists started?

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                47
                ·
                11 months ago

                The cultural revolution is a thing of the 70’s you fucking illiterate moron. The campaign for harvest was a part of the great leap forward, which was implemented in the late 50’s. We see this increase in life expectancy already at the beginning of chinese communist rule, yet somehow the alleviation of these things is what explains the increase in life expectancy from the onset of communist rule. How do you explain this? Time travel?

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  you fucking illiterate moron

                  It’s quite poetic that communists resort to such language much earlier in discussion than others, and also achieve much less than others when given opportunity. Be it in statesmanship or in their lives really (that part is sad).

                  • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    41
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    It is quite fitting that libs choose to tone police rather than relate to the discussion at hand. They do this because they know, deep down, that they are fools, basing their worldview on vibes instead of factual observations. It is also quite revealing that right-wing doofuses always lack a back bone, they cannot stand by their world-view and so they attempt to hide it. It seeps into their very language, were basic honesty is a struggle. Instead of directly relating to the person they are conversing with, they often choose passive language that hides what they say. This allows them to deny themselves, when they are rightfully called out. This is cowardice.
                    Answer my question. If it makes you feel better you can use adult language too.

                  • Babs [she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    37
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You’re being called illiterate because you’ve demonstrated that you don’t know the history of the events you are speaking so confidently on. You’ve claimed that Chinese communists are at fault for repression that predates their existence, while mashing up historical events that happened decades apart. You’ve shown no actual understanding of history, and your entire ideology shows that - you would rather engage in utopian fantasies than look at how systems have actually been implemented in reality. You back an ideology that is nothing but a wordy justification for “give the rich more power” and bolster it with a propagandized child’s understanding of history (communism means famine and repression right?).

                    People in this thread have replied with shitposts, but also well-sourced refutations for your claims. You’ve given us your thoughts on things with nothing backing them up.

                  • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    33
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    also achieve much less than others when given opportunity.

                    First in space, first cancer vaccine, first to weld titanium, and first to recognize you deserve a punch in the mouth.

          • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            This is the antiquity China that the communists ended that you want to return to.

            “It has been estimated that, by the 19th century, 40–50% of all Chinese women may have had bound feet, rising to almost 100% in upper-class Han Chinese women.”

            Foot binding is done between the ages of 4 and 9 " To enable the size of the feet to be reduced, the toes on each foot were curled under, then pressed with great force downwards and squeezed into the sole of the foot until the toes broke."

            as early as the 13th Century we have scholar Che Ruoshui wrote the first known criticism of the practice: “Little girls not yet four or five years old, who have done nothing wrong, nevertheless are made to suffer unlimited pain to bind [their feet] small. I do not know what use this is.”

            “If the infection in the feet and toes entered the bones, it could cause them to soften, which could result in toes dropping off; however, this was seen as a benefit because the feet could then be bound even more tightly.”

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s crazy how the commies started 3 famines when the KMT was in charge and disguised themselves as the entire KMT to collaborate with Japan.