Climate-vulnerable nations’ hopes that the world was on the cusp of an agreement to rapidly phase out the use of fossil fuels at the COP28 climate summit were shattered when a new draft text emerged from negotiations drastically watering down such language.

Australian Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen, speaking on behalf of the Umbrella Group of nations, which includes the United States, the United Kingdom, Norway and Canada, told the COP that the group could not sign the agreement as it stood.

  • FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe not such a great idea to have a literal oil sultan host the event. Bad optics and so on.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe next time don’t host it in an oil country.

    Oops, next time it’s already planned to be hosted in an oil country?

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bunch of BS theater. Look at em acting like theyre doing anything. No country needs the rest of the world to give them permission to address the climate crisis themselves. Get to building renewable energy and taking down fossil fuel companies.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The reason we don’t use renewables is that fossil fuels are much cheaper.

      If one country goes alone in developing them, they and their citizens pay more for a very marginal benefit.

      This is a collective action problem, individual countries acting by themselves aren’t going to solve it.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not processing our waste water through water treatment plants is also cheaper. Our bodies dont care that the toxic water saved us some money, and earth’s climate doesnt care about our economy either.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not processing our waste water leads to very local consequences, which is we process it. Adding to climate change is a global problem, any one country’s actions have relatively modest effects. So we don’t invest to stop it.

          I’m not saying it’s a good thing. But it is a serious thing so we should be clear on the causes etc.

  • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I suspect no significant change will occur until wealthy people from wealthy countries are forced to abandon homes in coastal areas, or some similar worldwide phenomenon occurs.

  • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    A disease doesn’t know or care that it’s a disease. If the host is being harmed it’s going to naturally fight back. Sorry, E. Coli, you’re just not welcome whether or not you’ve grown accustomed to the host.

  • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    The short-term impacts of fugitive methane from oil and gas extraction are horrendous and can outweigh the long-term benefits compared to coal. If we can’t even reach an agreement on acknowledging methane as an underreported problem that makes natural gas much worse than it’s claimed to be, how can we expect to make any progress towards a resolution phasing out the use of fossil fuels?

    American energy production from fossil fuels has risen 40% over the past two decades with the rise of natural gas and it’s showing no signs of stopping. China, despite owning the majority of the renewables market, has only managed to build up enough renewables manufacturing capacity to outpace energy demand growth this year. India is still stuck with coal for lack of better options. The EU is literally subsidizing tens of cents per kWh to prop up their economy with coal after the loss of cheap Russian gas. The big players are asleep at the wheel.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Am I reading this right? The two biggest polluters (US & China) came into this with an agreement to a certain approach, yet the final was watered down to nothing?

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Then be left behind while the rest move on to save our species. May history remember the oil barons as nearly the worst members of our species to ever consume oxygen

    • wieson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think you misunderstood the title. Australia will not sign the death certificate of small islands like Samoa. They will suffer heavily if we don’t stop with fossil fuels.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    If anyone thinks any sort of climate talks involving reduction In oil output anywhere would be successful, I’ve got bad news for you. I’ve resigned to the idea that the human species will go back to a medieval type society if not extinct.