• Justice@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not the kind of attack. It’s the fact that they did it at all. Maybe they’re trying to draw attention back to Ukraine and cause a reaction from Russia that “justifies” further aid.

    • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not defending Ukraine, far from it, but Russia is importing military supplies from China, mostly across a relatively small number of rail lines. Interrupting that flow of goods is for them, a worthwhile endeavour even without any propaganda outcome, the same as disabling railways between Ukraine and Poland would be for Russia.

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t disagree. In a hypothetical long list of targets for Ukraine to strike, this is probably one of the “best” ones since it’s clearly a valid military target against a nation currently invading them (agree or disagree on justification, it’s an event that is happening).

        It just also feels like a possible escalation when (naively, apparently) I thought, or last I saw, Ukraine and Russia were starting on some sort of peace agreement. Admittedly, I haven’t read up much on Ukraine in a couple months. I hope they are still working on an agreement and this doesn’t ruin anything.