• nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Palestine doesn’t, in theory, have any ability to escalate against NATO/USA, whereas Russia absolutely does. The NATO master has to keep their Ukrainian dog’s leash short because otherwise the master might get end up getting bitten by the Russians.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, exactly. It’s never about human rights or civilian casualties, it’s about limiting blowback. Although in my opinion there will still be blowback in the form of terrorist attacks to the US. But I guess that’s a price they’re willing to pay, as that just gives them excuses for more surveillance laws to be put in place, while in the grand scheme of things terrorist attacks really don’t matter.

      • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        if there were any terrorist attacks in the us it would provide a justification for doing whatever the hell else the US would like to do but for whatever reason is holding back