The piece was nearing publication when the journal decided against publishing it. You can read the article here.

  • Yamainwitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is such a powerful article, thank you for sharing. Should come as no surprise that Harvard Law Review refused to publish, I’m sure their endowments are heavily vested in the military industrial complex.

  • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    On Saturday, following several days of debate and a nearly six-hour meeting, the Harvard Law Review’s full editorial body came together to vote on whether to publish the article. Sixty-three percent voted against publication. In an e-mail to Egbariah, HLR President Apsara Iyer wrote, “While this decision may reflect several factors specific to individual editors, it was not based on your identity or viewpoint.”

    What a crock of horseshit.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I actually do not get this type of headline. Outlets are not required to publish what is put in front of them. The title should just be the second half basically.