• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    W3schools is a piece of shit that shouldn’t be used anyway. They publish inaccurate information and always have. Plus, we have mdn, a similar concept for a website just executed 1000% better.

    • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve just started learning to code. ._. I have no Idea yet what is good and what not. I just looked up an example for Boolean and W3 Schools was the first that came up.

      Why is it so bad? Everything Ive read so far from there was pretty accurate. But it was mostly beginner Stuff tho.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Like I said, they have incorrect information. I can’t recommend MDN enough, especially because they have browser compatibility info

      • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Beginner stuff is good enough as far as I remember, just try not to rely on it too much in the long term (since MDN is also a good alternative)

      • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think it’s bad–it’s impossible to make error-free material, and it’s more error-free than not, for sure.

        But other people are right: you’ll “graduate” to MDN and not look at W3 Schools again.

    • morrowind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      W3schools does tend to be more beginner friendly that MDN

    • Kuinox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      They still have some few good content. I didn’t found an equivalent of the (inexhaustive) selector list of W3School on mdn.

  • Alexxxolotl@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    B-b-but fish is so good!! I like it more than chicken or beef actually… Especially if it’s in sushi (´┓`*)<sup>drool~</sup>

    • Catpurrple@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Seafood is great, as long as you live near a coast. I think that gives a better chance that that “fishy” smell and taste is not overwhelming, because if that’s what you don’t like about it, I’m pretty sure it mostly shouldn’t be that way, I think it tends to be more mild the fresher they are. When in-land stores and restaurants import fish, it could be longer between catch and cooking than a coastal place.

      Or you just don’t like any seafood and nothing will change your mind, also valid.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Seafood is meh if you didn’t grow up eating it. Source: I grew up around Dallas (where fried catfish is as close as you usually get to fresh seafood) and I’ve lived in Seattle for >10 years without developing a taste for seafood.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Deep fried and fresh is okay. This includes fish, calamari rings, etc. Anything else is a hard no including oysters, prawns, non deep fried fish, lobsters, crabs, etc