Membership is declining at the gun right’s group as it also faces financial difficulties. Critics say the future looks bleak.

    • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d be one thing if they were only opposed by people for more gun control, but they aren’t even really good at their core mission. All they do is simp for the GOP, even when doing so runs counter to their stated agenda.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The NRA is a marketing team for gun manufacturers, and what sells guns is fear of gun bans. The NRA does everything in their power to fuel those fears.

        Pro and anti gun alike hate them. It’s mostly just boomers keeping them going.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They aren’t a gun rights organization. They aren’t even a manufacturer’s organization. They are Republican shills, first, last, and always.

          I was finally convinced they had abandoned gun owners when they endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012. When a gun rights organization openly endorses the signer of a gun ban, there is something deeply wrong.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That was slightly before my time, but yes, they did endorse Reagan in 1980 and 1984, and Reagan had signed the Mulford Act 13 years earlier. The Mulford act wasn’t a gun ban per se; it prohibited carry of loaded firearms without a permit.

              Reagan went on to support the Brady Bill and the 1994 AWB after his presidency. Reagan also banned carry in national parks. Clinton and 2 Bushes didn’t undo that mistake; Obama fixed it in his first month in office.

              But I digress: the NRA has done far more for the Republican Party than it has done for gun rights.

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                the NRA has done far more for the Republican Party than it has done for gun rights

                It’s the same story with evangelical groups like Focus on the Family: They’re just shills for Republicans, and are actively hurting their religion in the process.

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. I belonged to the NRA way back when they were a safety and information organization. They began to sell high priced commemorative hunting guns, then commemorative military guns. Soon they started selling military style guns like the M1 Garand rifle and the M1 carbine. I quit. Their push continued into modern M16s while simultaneously pushing scare articles to convince people of dangers so great that they would need buy military style weapons. The NRA degenerated into a money and greed operation that became the opposite of its origins intent.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve even wormed their way into schools. They have “Eddie the Eagle” that teaches elementary school kids gun safety. With NRA logos all over the place, of course. I was disgusted when my daughter brought the information home.

      Absolutely kids should be taught gun safety. They just shouldn’t get it with a heaping helping of NRA.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say it started with Harlan Carter. He was the one who decided that the NRA should be all about the profits of gun manufacturers, and not about safe and sane gun culture.

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gun culture is just a different and insane thing in the US. We have a bit of it in Canada and gun issues in the cities, but guns are highly regulated here, maybe too much in some specific aspects. I’m in favor of less restrictions for historical pieces similar to historical cars where you can apply for that status.

        Where I’m from lots of people have guns but there’s not really a gun culture, they’re basically used for animal defense. Last incident I know of was a deliriously sick coyote getting in to a horse paddock in daylight.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The NRA changed American thinking from “guns are tools that we sometimes need for protection” to “GUNS ARE THE ONLY THING PROTECTING YOUR FAMILY AND YOUR FREEDOM!!!1!!!”.

          They can rot in hell.

          • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You just know there’s so many Americans with guns who can’t wait to kill someone for the right reason in the most violent way, it’s like their fantasy.

            I was listening to an American at a work outing once who got inspected at the Canadian border, and she was ranting about how they thought she had a gun and were checking everywhere. I’m sympathizing cause that sucks, then she’s like “but they never checked my purse where I kept my gun!” and it’s like fuck sakes woman, you certainly made your point…