• Venicon@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not going to pretend to be smart enough to understand any of it but I think it’s good news?

    I would be keen to have solar panels or a solar array on my property but they are so damn expensive.

    • blackfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The theoretical limit we can get out of the sun with panels is 40-45% so we are getting pretty close to that.

        • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The materials that do the absorption are not effective across the entire wavelength spectrum of the sun. They can only absorb at a certain wavelength range, but the spectrum range of the sun is very wide.

          Edit. Also other reasons, like recombination rate where the photon hitting the panel generates an electron-hole pair which is then collected and used for evegy, but electrons and holes tend to want to recombine, after which we cannot use them for evergy. We want this rate to be zero, but it never is, it is a probabilistic process. So even if you can absorb everything, you can’t utilise everything you absorb.

        • blackfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my very limited understanding there are too many loses between material to endpoint. The old limit used to be 35% before they made new materials so maybe we can improve the potential in future.

    • Certainity45
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. It is not 1:1 especially on these test conditions, but currently the truthful seller says the real-world effiency-% is around 15%. So probably with this new technology we can start saying the real-world effiency-% as around 20%, which is significant leap.