minus-squareZoboomafoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·1 year agoNothing you said rebutted the section of my comment you quoted, you just started fighting strawmen
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·1 year agoDon’t try and lie so blatantly. I directly responded to your implication that Marx just wasn’t thinking about things clearly.
minus-squareZoboomafoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·1 year ago In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion. Nothing in that implies what you’re accusing me of
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoOh, get fucked if you’re gonna try the pedantic game. Go ahead and tell me how I got it wrong and what you really meant if you’re gonna try this sleazy tactic. Otherwise, stfu with your bollocks.
minus-squareZoboomafoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·1 year agoOh ok, what I really meant was: In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoYou’re gonna have to try a little harder than just repeating yourself.
minus-squareZoboomafoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoWhy shouldn’t I? I stand by my original point and you’ve done nothing to rebut it
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYou can claim I haven’t, but anyone with a brain can see my original response and see that I in fact have.
minus-squareZoboomafoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoMe: In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion. You: I can’t fathom the arrogance of people who say “Marx just didn’t think of x, y or z” Please, enlighten me how I said that
Nothing you said rebutted the section of my comment you quoted, you just started fighting strawmen
Don’t try and lie so blatantly. I directly responded to your implication that Marx just wasn’t thinking about things clearly.
Nothing in that implies what you’re accusing me of
Oh, get fucked if you’re gonna try the pedantic game. Go ahead and tell me how I got it wrong and what you really meant if you’re gonna try this sleazy tactic. Otherwise, stfu with your bollocks.
Oh ok, what I really meant was:
You’re gonna have to try a little harder than just repeating yourself.
Why shouldn’t I? I stand by my original point and you’ve done nothing to rebut it
You can claim I haven’t, but anyone with a brain can see my original response and see that I in fact have.
Me:
You:
Please, enlighten me how I said that