• Grammaton Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but Android doesn’t make me constantly enter my password to do basic things. Also, Apple takes away a lot of control from their consumers.

    I’ll take the phone that isn’t dumbed down tyvm

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ideally you shouldn’t have to compromise. GrapheneOS without Google is an option.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It literally isn’t - Graphene only supports Google Pixel phones.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve apparently missed the point. Graphene exists solely to harden security and privacy by disabling the googly parts of the phone. That is clearly what was meant by “without Google”

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Graphene is is way over hyped. You can basically the same thing with lineage os. The key is just not using gsf

                • LaggyKar@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But then you can’t use any apps that require Play Services. The killer feature of GrapheneOS is letting you run Play Services in a sandbox.

                • sadreality@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Unlocked bootloader is considered a vulnerability tho

                  But if your threats model is toxic Tim, satya and sundar, it will do the job just fine.

                  • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You can relock the bootloader though can’t you?

                    Genuine question. I used to be an avid ROMer back int day until I got really really annoyed at all the hoops I had to jump through to use Google Wallet.

                    Now I have a Pixel 7a and I’m considering ROMs again. So I am wondering if I can just relock the bootloader once I find a ROM I like and it’ll pass all the Safety net bullshit and allow me to use my phone like it should be, just with a custom ROM on it.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And how do you know there aren’t hardware level trackers in Google’s chips? The kind Graphene can’t override? Do you trust Google not to do that?

            • Nath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The people who install Graphene and other modified Android variants on their devices are a lot more likely to be monitoring packets sent from their devices.

              Believe me, we’d know the same day an android device that had been de-Googled called home. That would make worldwide news.

            • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because this will get .001% more total data considering the low number of GrapheneOS users. Besides, this is highly illegal and would result in significant public outcry and legal consequences far greater in cost than any potential benefits.

              And if you cannot trust Google with their processors, you cannot trust any other company either.

              • 520@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because all of that has stopped OEMs in the past…oh wait! No it hasn’t (looks at Lenovo)

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I trust them not to do it. Cause when it was found out not if when it would hurt them.

      • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        GrapheneOS still takes away a bit of control though. Mainly in that it’s locked down for privacy in some ways that you can’t disable

        • Alonely0 🦀@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @soulfirethewolf @ijeff its biggest lockdown is the security model, which even though it won’t disallow you from doing anything you couldn’t otherwise do (if you’re motivated enough), it draws the line of tradeoffs to make. I gave up rooting and a lot of stuff (like contactless payments) for it’s security and stability, and I’m fine with that, but you should ask yourself if that’s worth it for you. If you have to go out of your way to break the security model, even once, then it isn’t for you.