Which allowed the GOP controlled house to elect a much more fashy religious zealot who will be waaaaay worse for the country?

Am I missing something here? How is this not the biggest “own goal” they have pulled in recent memory? Now we get to listen to endless whining by liberal media outlets about how evil the new anti-daddy of the week is?

    • NewLeaf@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but isn’t their whole thing “harm reduction”? If you have a feckless enemy, wouldn’t it make more sense to leave them in place instead of rolling the dice on the next fascist?

      • Deadend [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They only care about harm reduction when it’s a statement.

        But there is no reason for the Dems to ever say Yes to any Republican rep.