• oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jokes on john locke, i’m an organ donor anyways 😎

    but to a degree I agree. in that chef example, at any point the chef could revoke consent and stop at any time. Likewise, somebody shouldn’t be able to sell themselves into slavery but it would be fine to agree to do work for free or under slavery conditions as long as you can revoke consent at any time. But the right should be inalienable such that nobody should be in a position where they could be coerced into doing that, it would have to be 100% voluntary and enthusiastic. Like if somebody was in a position where it was either agree to being a slave or be homeless or starve or otherwise suffer, then I would argue society has failed them, we didn’t protect their rights adequately

    • rwhitisissle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jokes on john locke, i’m an organ donor anyways

      Right, but there’s no more harm that could come to you after you’re dead, so being an organ donor wouldn’t really qualify in this context. Your organs being donated after death diminishes you in no way and also potentially enriches the lives of others.

      • Jorgelino
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t have to be dead to donate organs. And donating something like a kidney does impact your health.

        • rwhitisissle
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but also on a very basic level organ donating is not the same thing as selling yourself into a lifetime of inescapable slavery.

          • Jorgelino
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For sure, but i’d argue it’s maybe comparable to the chef example.