Traditionally, retiring entails leaving the workforce permanently. However, experts found that the very definition of retirement is also changing between generations.

About 41% of Gen Z and 44% of millennials — those who are currently between 27 and 42 years old — are significantly more likely to want to do some form of paid work during retirement.

This increasing preference for a lifelong income, could perhaps make the act of “retiring” obsolete.

Although younger workers don’t intend to stop working, there is still an effort to beef up their retirement savings.

It’s ok! Don’t ever retire! Just work until you die, preferably not at work, where we’d have to deal with the removal of your corpse.

  • bluGill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Despite all that, things are overall better than previous generations. There is and always has been bad news. Life has always been a constant string of disasters, yet when you pause for a moment to reflect you realize that despite the bad news, overall it wasn’t that bad.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In many countries, yes. People in India and China for instance are on average more likely to not be in severe poverty and subsistence vs 40 years ago, though western-style modernization has caused it’s own problems. However most people are less well off in the US than we were in the 50s-90s. Reagan economics seems to have been ‘wait, why are we letting the middle class exist? We could just keep all their money’. Seriously though i was completely fucked over by what I mentioned and it’s only based on luck that I’m not homeless.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        62
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people in the Us are better off than the 50’s-90’s. They may feel worse off, but that is not an objective measure.

        • kureta
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are lots of objective measures. Here is one for you.

          • BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The argument of people being ‘better off’ now is that technology is better and more available. It is much cheaper to buy a big 4k flat panel tv now than a black and white tv with four channels and no remote back in the 50s. We have the Internet, smartphones, better health care, video games, music, streaming services, cheap air travel, food from all over the world, robot vacuum cleaners, air conditioning etc. etc.

            What we don’t have so much of is cheap housing, good secure jobs, any reasonable degree of income equality etc.

            • squiblet@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, fair point that racial equity and access to opportunity has increased significantly in most of the country. Gender equality has come a long way as well, though it’s also a “ha ha you have to work now too and your family is still worse off than it was, good luck with paying for day care”

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Which was a huge bullshit injustice which need correcting and hurt a lot of people.

              But now we’re at the point where skin color doesn’t matter in this scenario. Only bank balances matter. And you probably don’t have a high enough one to afford a house no matter what color your skin is.