• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an English literacy thing - we have several non-native English speakers and using only singular avoids making those folks’ lives harder. Besides it’s really nice to autopilot that categoryid is a foreign key to the category table. It also simplifies always plural words… I haven’t yet written CREATE TABLE pants but if I ever do there’s zero chance of me creating a pantid.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I tend to use underscores on join tables so table foo_bar would have a fooid and a barid. I have somewhat soured on this approach though since there are a lot of situations where you’ll have two m-m relationships between the same two tables with a different meaning… and having a fixed formula for m-m tables can make things ugly.

          If I get to design another greenfield database I’ll probably prefer using underscores for word boundaries in long table names.

      • Faresh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always thought they should be singular to be closer to the names we give entities and relations in a entity-relation diagram.