• WrittenWeird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ve also taken that starter home off the market, preventing someone else from being able to own a home and follow your path to ownership of a forever-property.

    If it’s not unethical at one rental property, when is it? Two? Three? Five?

    • pascal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve also taken that starter home off the market

      In Europe, maybe yes this would make sense.

      But in the US? Not a chance, there’s so much space you’re not taking anything from anyone.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      No argument, but there does need to be a certain rental market density. Not everyone wants to own, thats why we bought an easy to maintain unit near a university. Air BNB, holiday homes and “property parking” are the ones taking things out of circulation.

      Answer me this. Why should I take on the moral burden of the ethics and not a property group that owns literally hundreds of properties? Thats what I’m saying, these “landlord” memes seem to be trying to make me making a good choice as one family unit a despicable act in the eyes of “working people” when the people with real money and real power who have no shame and dont care just sieze the opportunity if I dont.

      • mycorrhiza they/them
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you’re doing less of the same thing the huge property groups are doing, but you’re still doing it