Stella Assange speaking to the Luxembourg Parliament on the persecution of Julian Assange

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol that’s BS, they literally started by leaking mostly secrets of post Soviet states, but nobody gave a shit and editors of news paper there were instructed by their higher ups in Washington not to publish it.

    Source: Mediastan (2013)

    And yes he probably did have a bias against Hillary, I wonder if that could be because SHE WAS ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN HIS PERSECUTION.

    • SLfgb@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually the Clinton/Podesta emails revealed a lot of dirt on Trump too, dirt the DNC had dug up…

    • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How could a secretary of state be involved in prosecution? That’s completely outside their job description and it isn’t as if that’s a job with a lot of free time.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You somehow think that the release of the State Department cables have nothing to do with the secret indictment?

        • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no secret indictment. We know exactly what the allegations are because that information is public.

          Regardless of that the Secretary of State is not providing direct input into the prosecution of an individual.

          In Assange’s specific case he was charged during Trump’s presidency so Hilary could not at any point have been involved in his prosecution.

          You are confused and you likely read shitty sources.