Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoGreatest harm reduction President.hexbear.netimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down10
arrow-up1146arrow-down1imageGreatest harm reduction President.hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareSorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoI’m sure libs will spin this as a super progressive move somehow.
minus-squareunderisklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·1 year agoFrom what I’ve seen they’re focusing on the “budget already allocated, nothing could be done” argument and just completely ignoring the part where something was in fact done, but not to prevent it.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year ago Blue MAGA logic right there Jack
minus-squareredtea@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoEven if it was a contractual thing, it would’ve been better to breach the contract, pay damages, and not build the wall. Monsters.
minus-squareditty@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoExactly what’s so shitty about this. The MF waived 26(!?) laws to get this to go, just because the money was there? The hell?
I’m sure libs will spin this as a super progressive move somehow.
From what I’ve seen they’re focusing on the “budget already allocated, nothing could be done” argument and just completely ignoring the part where something was in fact done, but not to prevent it.
Even if it was a contractual thing, it would’ve been better to breach the contract, pay damages, and not build the wall. Monsters.
Exactly what’s so shitty about this. The MF waived 26(!?) laws to get this to go, just because the money was there? The hell?