Chief executives of some of the world’s largest energy companies on Monday sought to defend themselves from criticism, saying it is not possible to keep everyone happy amid the planned energy transition.

Speaking at the ADIPEC oil and gas conference, which opened in Abu Dhabi on Monday, executives representing energy majors in the U.S., Europe and Asia sought to strike a positive tone on the current state of play for the fossil fuel industry.

It comes shortly after climate protesters took to the streets in hundreds of cities across the globe to demand that world leaders phase out the burning of fossil fuels, the chief driver of the climate crisis.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 year ago

    We pretty much know their position by now, they will live in wealth and luxury while the world burns.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder how long it’ll take them to realize that they have to live on the planet they’re destroying too. Hurricanes, droughts, forest fires, etc don’t give a shit about property value and destroy everything in their path. Sure, the boomers will check out before things get unbearable but there’s a lot of very rich people in their 40s and 50s that will live long enough to suffer with the rest of us.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It will take them a lot longer, since they are completely disconnected from the average person’s experience. Even those currently in their 40s aren’t going to suffer during their lifetime.

        • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing is tough, their lifestyle depends on the average person’s experience. The rich people aren’t the ones laboring to make fast cars, high definition TVs, building houses, refining fuel, working at power plants, farming, ranching, and all the other things that their lifestyle depends on.
          They just sit on top and collect the cash. When life gets bad for the people on the bottom those on top will have nothing, because despite what they try to say they’ve never really worked a day in their life and they sure as hell aren’t going to roll up their sleeves and do the dirty work themselves. It’s a pyramid of playing cards and when the bottom falls out the whole thing will collapse.

      • dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I assume they think they will be fine during their lifetime, and don’t care about their kids/grandkids/great grandkids.

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    “So, the debate has always been posed here, I’m reminded of an old saying: ‘If you want to keep everyone happy, sell ice cream.’ We are not in the business of ice cream — and I’m reminded, there are people who are lactose intolerant,”

    … what? The longer you stretch an analogy, the higher the chance it’s going to sound stupid and weird.

    Jokes aside, it’s really not the responsibility of the oil barons to sunset their own injury. The responsibility is on the lawmakers who sold us all out to lobbyists for campaign money. We could have regulated this industry 30 years ago and had it all but obsoleted by now, but instead we did fuck all.

    • Lemmylaugh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “After three or four years, I understood that maybe I was naïve, we will not please the activists. We will never make enough to please the ones which are against oil and gas, but my mission is not to please them,” Pouyanne said.

      Yikes there’s another problem. Maybe someone over there should make it the mission to listen to the scientists.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying that Kaczynski was right, but maybe people like this need to fear bombs from the citizens of the planet they’re murdering.

        And they’re right they can’t cut emissions enough to please us until they hit zero. That’s the amount we need to get to

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The system required personally ambitious people to the right thing for everyone instead of the thing that would get them further ahead as an individual. In the face of the wealth and power of the oil industry, corruption was almost inevitable, sadly.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At the same time as human beings they did have a responsibility to look at the devastation of their industry and not hide that or buy off regulators. Additionally you can argue they had a responsibility to begin the transition to less destructive energy in earnest. And they sure as shit had a responsibility to not buy out school curricula to indoctrinate children away from green energy like seriously what the fuck

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve burned enough fossil fuels. It’s time to burn the fossil fuel industry leadership now. And the politicians they’ve purchased.

  • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, they’re right that it is not possible to keep everyone happy while transitioning to renewable/green energy. If everything goes right, they will be very unhappy