Future Motion, the maker of the Onewheel electric skateboard, is recalling every one of them, including 300,000 Onewheel self-balancing vehicles in the US. Alongside the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the company now seeks to remedy the products after four known death cases — three without a helmet — between 2019 and 2021.

The recall comes a year after Future Motion took issue with the CPSC’s calls for recall and claimed that it tested and found nothing wrong with the Onewheels. At the time, the company issued a press release in objection to the CPSC and called the agency’s statements “unjustified and alarmist.”

Now Future Motion is moving forward with a voluntary recall it chose not to do almost a year earlier. The company is asking owners to stop using their Onewheels until they take appropriate action. For the newer Onewheel GT, Onewheel Pint X, Onewheel Pint, and Onewheel Plus XR, a software update with a new warning system is the remedy.

For early adopters, however, the CPSC and Future Motion are telling owners to stop using and discard the original Onewheel and Onewheel Plus. We asked Onewheel chief evangelist Jack Mudd in an email how many of the original units are affected, but Mudd refused to answer. Mudd also wouldn’t tell us why the company claimed there were no issues and publicly resisted issuing a recall back in 2022.

Mudd did say that the software update for the other models is rolling out worldwide, not just in the US.

Some crashes occurred due to Onewheel skateboards malfunctioning after being pushed to certain limits. The Onewheel GT, Onewheel Pint X, Onewheel Pint, and Onewheel Plus XR will receive a firmware update that will add a new warning “Haptic Buzz” feedback that riders can feel and hear when the vehicle enters an error state, is low on battery, or is nearing its limits and needs to slow down.

“This update is the culmination of months of work with the CPSC,” reads the company’s recall website. Last November, it called the CPSC’s warning about Onewheels “misleading” but stated it would “work to enhance the CPSC’s understanding of self-balancing vehicle technology and seek to collaborate with the agency to enhance rider safety.”

To install the update, owners must connect their Onewheels to the accompanying app and run a firmware update — the process is fully explained in a new video.

For early adopters, however, owners can receive a “pro-rated credit of $100 to the purchase of a new board,” according to Mudd. The credit will only be issued after owners confirm that they have disposed of the old model.

Alongside Future Motion’s blink on the decision to recall Onewheel, the company shared a new video on YouTube highlighting the new Haptic Buzz feature as well as best practices when riding. “We’ve been working closely with the CPSC for over a year in order to develop this new safety feature,” Mudd says in the video. He adds that ignoring pushback or Haptic Buzz “can result in serious injury or death.” It took engineers a while to whip up Haptic Buzz; perhaps it’s something that would not have been ready in a timely fashion after CPSC’s first whistle last year.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know about garbage, but what actual monopolistic practices have they shown? Haven’t they just cornered that market with a unique and superior product?

      • Lettuce eat lettuce
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        1 year ago

        Watch Louis Rossman’s videos for more details, but no. Onewheel is extremely litigious and were able to get a patent for the entire design of single wheel vehicles, so they can basically sue anybody for patent infringement just for making any kind of single wheeled vehicle.

        It would be like if Ford got a patent for any machine with an engine and four wheels, and could sue any company that tried to create their own car.

        They also have spent a ton of effort purposely making their Onewheel boards as tough to repair as possible. The earliest models of boards used a bunch of off the shelf parts and could be swapped, modded, and repaired by regular folks. They started writing their software to purposely brick any new boards detected if plugged in, so users couldn’t buy a battery or motherboard from a broken Onewheel of the same model and use parts from it on to repair their current Onewheel.

        They are super anti-consumer, anti-competition, and only are as popular as they are because of these practices. They innovate less and less and instead spend tons of effort making sure nobody else can create a better product. They also don’t want users modding or repairing their products, because they can’t monetize that.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Aw man, that’s super lame. Thanks, I’ll check out those videos!

          • Lettuce eat lettuce
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No prob. Yeah it was super dissappointing for me too when I found out because I initially really wanted to buy one, but I won’t touch that company’s products with a 10 foot pole.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Keep an eye on Floatwheel. I’m an avid Onewheel rider and got the chance to try out a Floatwheel the other day and they slap. They’re way more consumer friendly, use open source VESC, and will ship free replacement parts for things like bumpers. They’re still first gen and are a little fragile for my taste, but definitely something to keep an eye on.

              • Lettuce eat lettuce
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh nice! I’ll check them out for sure. I live in a mid-sized city so a vehicle like that would work great for me to get around on.

        • HiddenLayer5
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haven’t electric unicycles been around for way longer though? I remember Vat 19 selling one years ago and one of the meal delivery companies in my city uses them on occasion. Do they have a patent on those too?

          • shroomato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, the patent is specifically for the ones that you stand sideways on, like on a skateboard.
            Also all electric unicycle manufacturers are based in China, which doesn’t care about patents much.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but i love my GT so… also, I dont remember ever seeing any VESC anywhere near as good

      • Pietson@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not super involved with the community but I thought vesc was starting to match futuremotion software, aren’t the floatlife guys using vesc as daily drivers or something?