• skizzles
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    And you are putting words in my mouth.

    I never said it was an inconvenience.

    The UAW protesters should be protecting themselves. They are already putting themselves on the line with the protest. They shouldn’t put themselves in more danger just so they can be taken out of the fight.

    Try to think rationally, educate yourself on the real world and how it works.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are taking out of both sides of your mouth. “They didn’t have been run over but they had it coming!”

      • skizzles
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        More putting words in my mouth.

        Good job.

        • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Explain yourself differently then?

          And before you say “JuSt UndErsTand bEtteR” “it’s nOt my fAuLt they aRe dUmB” consider who’s the one making a case here and who’s responsibility it is to speak your own points clearly as possible.

          I’m fucking awful at wording how I feel sometimes about a viewpoint I have, but just giving up on conveying what you’re trying to get at…. I mean what’s even the point in speaking your mind in the first place then you know? Obviously the way you worded it wasn’t clear enough to convey what you mean, just try again.

          • skizzles
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            BOTH ARE WRONG, BOTH ARE TO BLAME.

            Don’t stand in front of oncoming cars if you don’t want to get hit. Don’t be a dick and run people over.

            Is that simple enough for you?

            Or is reading comprehension not your strong point?

            Edit: I apologize for that last line but It’s quite frustrating trying to express a valid and correct point accurately and concisely while consistently being shit on and insulted. Even after going back and reading the several different comments I made, it is pretty clear what I have been saying. Both parties are at fault. I don’t see how it could be misinterpreted to me just straight up blaming the protestors.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              while consistently being shit on and insulted.

              I suppose it makes sense that you’re less likely to listen to people if you feel like you are being shit on and insulted.

              Is that simple enough for you?

              Or is reading comprehension not your strong point?

              Maybe if you weren’t shitting on and insulting people they wouldn’t come at you with a similar attitude.

            • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Learn how to control your outbursts and your life will be infinitely easier my friend. I’m right there with you, look at my post history too.

              You’ll catch more flies with honey than vinegar. There’s all kinds of gadfly’s swarming about on this platform, keep in mind you might appear like one to others. Everyone should be ignoring them or calmly and concisely squashing them anyway. Don’t wanna get squirshed _

              Be well

    • stillwater@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Where are you getting this presupposition that striking means putting oneself in danger?

      What real world factor involves this bizarre assumption?