• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    My local walkable grocery store is a Safeway. They sell a 3lb pack of ground turkey for $18.

    Walmart, target, smart and final, and Lucky’s are all <$12, but I have to drive. And that’s one item. I save hundreds a month in groceries because I have a car and can shop around. I can wait for deals, I can buy in bulk.

    The idea of a walkable city is nice, but if you restrict competition, prices skyrocket. And yeah, that Safeway is walkable to an apartment, the only grocery store that is, and they know it. It is infuriating to dismiss practicality for an dream.

    Walkable cities and car hate are just another generations NYMBY’s. Those rich enough and finantialy secure to afford premiums that push others out. Meanwhile this transitional uncertainty greatly harms many of us struggling to make ends meet.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s one thing I won’t understand about this self-reclusive, anti-atomony movement.

        Its basic logic. If I have a walkable radius of 1 mile and a drivable radius of 10, I have the accessability of all grocery stores within that area with a greater selection and purchasing power. These apartments I referenced have exactly one store to shop for groceries. The decision is literally A) Do you purchase an overpriced product for convenience or B) spend an extra hour and public transit to hunt a deal.

        I mean sometimes I feel like I’m arguing with children; zero experience in real life. Yes, some can make it work. No, it doesn’t work for everyone. Area of accessibility and the competitive choices it allows, are essential to those not as well off.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m still undecided about this “fuck cars” movement, but you seem to be kind of saying that walkable cities won’t work because presently you can’t walk everywhere you want to go. I think the answer to that is simply that you don’t live in a walkable city - your city has been designed around the notion that everyone has access to a car.

          I guess the inability to drive around smurfing up bargains is a very specific problem that walkable cities aren’t intended to address. I think the basic premise is that if there’s more people seeking basic vittles within walking distance from their home then competition will appear. They may not be quite as cheap as at the Walmart 10 miles away, but then the opportunities for local vendors will improve your own personal financial circumstances also.

          As an aside, when you spend a little time in a large city with public transport and lots of shops, it’s easy to see how the fuck cars movement seems like a no-brainer. “If no one had cars then no one would need them!”… but as someone who lives in a regional / rural area it’s really hard to see how it could possibly work. I mean perhaps “possible” in some way but it definitely undermines most of the reasons I enjoy living away from a large city.

        • wishthane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the result of poor planning, and not true everywhere. Places with good planning for non-automotive transport have much smaller shops, smaller streets, and more of everything because of it. The radius you can reach within 15 minutes might be smaller, but the actual number of places you can get to can be much larger.

    • wishthane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That doesn’t even make sense - you are in a neighborhood that only has one grocery store nearby due to car dependent planning, therefore walkability isn’t practical?

      I live in a neighborhood that was definitely originally designed for cars and has been gradually getting better and I’ve already got at least two grocery stores I can easily walk to, plus two convenience stores and a pharmacy that’s kind of also a convenience store. Then I’ve got another three or four that I can easily bike to. And these aren’t small grocery stores, they’re all like massive supermarkets designed originally around car traffic.

      If you spend time in places that have actual walkable neighborhoods, you find lots of much smaller grocery stores and you can easily shop around and compare prices on foot.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there’s a big difference in how you understand these things depending what angle you come from, logistically your situation makes no sense and only seems to exist, as you said, because of car centric infrastructure. Where I live was very much designed around foot traffic and yes it’s great being able to get all the daily things nearby, I love the parks and on rare occasions I actually went to go where the busses take me, plan to be back before they stop and don’t have to take more than a bags worth of stuff with me they’re great too.

        There are very real problems though, local library is useful if you order books and don’t mind waiting forever, shops likewise are great for bread, cheese and snacks but unless you want a very boring diet and dont mind paying a premium otherwise you need to go somewhere with a higher volume of trade than the walkable zone around the local shops can support - that’s before you consider things beyond food like tools, clothes, and services.

        All the small grocery stores their entire customer base can walk to are more expensive than larger stores and they all sell the same basic items - it’s just logistics. It’s not hard to look at the lives people here lived before cars, they had less and did less and lived much worse lives - well those the couldn’t afford a horse drawn carriage of course, personal wheeled transport has been deemed a necessity of good living for centuries.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My car is 20 years old, runs great, gets 30mpg, and easy to repair. It costs about $40/month in gas, $800/year in insurance and I purchased it used for $11500. Unexpected expenses usually run $500 every 4 years or so.

        It opened doors to better employment, bridged the gap to my distant friends, supports my recreational activities, saved my life with a medical emergency.

        Without it, I couldnt see my friends, family, or nieces/nephews. I couldnt see the milky way without light pollution. I’d have to accept what I’m offered rather than find what I need. I have to autonomy to pick a direction and explore; to find nature, peace or get away from civilization.

        I’m not rich, but my life is richer with what I can do with a car.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It costs about $40/month in gas, $800/year in insurance and I purchased it used for $11500.

          Must be nice to be able to afford to pay $11500 for a car. More than half of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck.

          • Miqo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I generally agree with you, but I think you missed the mark here. People who manage to buy a used car that they may need to get by are not the issue here. I hate cars and car dependant cities, but also have a lease on a used one that I can barely afford because the town I’m in right now is 100% carbrained. When I lived in the city, I was proud not to own a car. I also currently don’t have the money for it in my budget, so my quality of life has taken a significant hit by this necessary purchase (though it would be much worse without it). I live paycheck-to-paycheck right now too.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re being so disingenuous, making it sound like car ownership is out the reach of half of Americans is the most absurd thing I’ve heard in a long time.

            For most people a car is a vital expense to allow them to live, work and shop at far less expense so becomes a net saving. If you’re working minimum wage then you can afford a car, this is born out by the fact that cars are totally ubiquitous.

            Bad and unfaithful arguments just hurt the cause

              • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                You earn more than me, my car cost 2k. Over 90% of American households have at least one car, there’s a lot wrong with cars back lack of access to them is not one of the issues

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How much is your rent?

                  $800 a month for every other expense in a month means I’m skipping meals more often then not so there’s something wrong with your math.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I live where there is terrible public transportation so everybody and their grandma has to drive everywhere and can tell you that’s a whole different ball game. Sure, maybe it’s cheap to drive where you are but here insurance is at least $300 per month per car, because since everyone is driving there are more accidents. So you may be getting subsidized by all the people who aren’t driving, basically.

          Our downtown though has moved in the opposite direction, it was dead when I was in highschool, remember walking around there in the weekends looking at all the old empty buildings that used to be retail, we would explore it like it was historical ruins. But over time it’s come back and now many people living there & working there, restaurants and bars and little groceries, different from what it was, malls killed downtown retail then internet killed most of the the malls.