• queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There should always be a reserve supply of vacant properties to give people freedom of movement between regions and cities.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          65M is what percentage of 1.4Bn? It’s about 5%.

          5% oversupply is pretty reasonable, especially given that the housing isn’t fungible and the populations are more mobile than the houses are.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

          I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

            • zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

              Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.