whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

    • kool_newt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chain link fences are useless. See I can spout random statements that sound like facts too.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        michael-laugh the political compass was invented solely to make “right libertarianism” look like a real ideology. It was pushed by billionaire money into schools to rot peoples brains. Its not real and provides no insight, it only furthers political illiteracy in the US. Its not a random statement, its a bullshit concept

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Your buying into the central assumption that their is such a thing as authoritarianism. All governments are authoritarian its a meaningless distiction in political economy.

            Right libertarianism is a bullshit ideology, because its just liberalism.

            The system that works better is just reality. Understanding that political economy is a single entity not separate axis

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just to point out how bullshit it is.

        There was a thread maybe a month back where we all took the test and everyone is “left libertarian,” because the entire design of this thing is ridiculous.

            • kool_newt@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok, please tell me the problems you have with the political compass disregarding the website and questions. If it’s so flawed, you should easily be able to point them out right?

              • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                1 year ago

                I already have told you. Political economy is one thing not two separate axis. Promoting the opposite is promoting political illiteracy, which is the “tools” whole point. Its not educating its obfuscating.

                • kool_newt@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’d say your obfuscating by conflating politics and economics. Sure they are closely related and thus the X,Y graph, but they are not the same. Neither of us is the arbiter of truth so I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree here.

                  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    31
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’d say your obfuscating by conflating politics and economics

                    You could say that, but only because you’ve fundamentally bought in to a right wing framing through belief a right wing propaganda tool.

                    Neither of us is the arbiter of truth

                    Ok? Thats a complete thought terminating cliche. No one has to be the sole arbiter of truth to say things that are true about our material reality.

                    I didn’t invent the concept of political economy. If you think its obfuscation, take it up with the political theorists of the 17th and 18th centuries and the socialist theorists of the 19th who drew on their work.

                    I’m not inventing things and arbiting truth, im talking about actual theory and not propaganda models, that have clearly worked in your case.

                    Sure they are closely related and thus the X,Y graph, but they are not the same

                    This is the problem with the political compass, and its entire reason for existing. Its to decouple politics from economics and create a belief that some things are similar or related when they are not - a flattening of political understanding to render people illiterate.

                    The use of “authoritarianism” as an axis - a word that is not meaningfully definable - is only used to perpetuate the Cold War mythologies of communists being the same as nazis. Just like double genocide theory, this view of politics is ultimately nazi apologia.

                    On the reverse, it serves to legitimize “right libertarianism” by flattening peoples understanding to make it look like it has something in common with actual ideological traditions like anarchism. As a professed anarchist, you should abhor this flattening and equivocation and the model that promotes it. I’m not personally an anarchist, but i find it disgusting how they’ve sought legitimacy by trying to tie themselves to actual intellectual and political tendencies.

                  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    obfuscating by conflating politics and economics

                    How do you type this out without spotting the obvious absurdity, just what do you think the point of politics is?

                    There can be no conflation because politics and economics are inseparable, like how hardware and software are inseparable components of computerization

                    Every civilization has a mode of production that allows said civilization to reproduce itself, and that reproduction is implemented as a matter of political will shaped thru the realities of whatever specific mode defines the civilization, it’s not a “close relationship” that may or may not interact depending on some vacuum context, instead politics and economics are literal embodiments of each other that always interact in the physical world humans inhabit