• x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Should they then also throw people in mental asylums and condition them not to imagine naked people then because you think porn is bad

    • ChiefSinner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely not and you’re making analogies that don’t even compare. But when is porn ever beneficial? It gets people who watch it dopamine hits, and too much has negative health affects. If anything, it could be argied as a precursor to mental illness. Not to mention erectile dysfunction. It also really affects relationships negatively. Why do you think do many marriages end in divorce? And then look at the actresses/actors. Do you think they can get a normal job? As far as I can see, it hurts people instead of help. Yes it just feeds into peoples passions in a negative way. Thus, porn is evil.

      • x4740N@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is what you believe from your own perspective because you choose to see the negative side of things regarding this topic

        As for why you see the negative side I don’t know but I ask that you look at the positive side of this topic as well just as long as you don’t start seeing the positive side to intolerance and bigotry in other topics

        r/nofap on reddit was a community on reddit that very much only saw a negative perspective on porn and masturbation

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Even if I did you’d likely refuse to change because it appears you’re firmly stuck in the mindset of seeing a negative perspective of porn and masturbation so it would be a waste of my time, effort and mental energy as I wouldn’t be getting anything back from that investment

            • ChiefSinner@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol another response (not from you in particular, just in general on this thread) avoiding the question and not answering. I’m guessing the reason is because there isn’t any positives.

      • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It gets people who watch it dopamine hits, and too much has negative health affects.

        So you’re in favor of banning all sugar, sodas, sweets, donuts, hamburgers, hot dogs, BBQ, pizza etc, right?

        • ChiefSinner@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wasn’t those banned in public schools during Obama? And for the matter, yes. Especially in schools

          • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not just in schools, everwhere, to adults too.

            And also ban the internet, tv, movies smartphones, tablets and PC games too.

            • ChiefSinner@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Uhhh sir this is a Wendy’s…but in all actuality, that isn’t on the internet - which is the main topic of discussion. The government banning certain things is normal. They can ban them in public services, like schools, if they want. They also ban prostitution, drug use, and rape/incest, so I’m not seeing your point.