Extremely not-fun fact: collectively, humanity currently produces more than enough food for every person. But a huge part of it is either wasted or inaccessible by people that need them, which usually results in them not going to anyone and being wasted, which is why we still have food scarcity.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I stated a fact, I didn’t suggest anything. wtf are you still talking for?

    If you’re paying to get rid of something you paid for, you fucked up.

    • TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like you figured it out then. If we can just determine a way to efficiently distribute the food, then we’ll be good.

        • TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought we we were close to a breakthrough. Just for fun imagine a situation where eliminating a food product costs 100 pesos, but packaging and shipping that same food product to another location costs 200 pesos; which of these is more economical?

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m going to block you because I’m not interested in speaking with you.

            • TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Probably smart. Blocking me costs you about one minute of time, whereas continually responding to me has already cost you several minutes. Way more efficient.