• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. You’ll probably be assigned a job that’s required to be done for the good of society.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of that one twitter thread “what will your job be in the commune” and everyone said the most useless shit like “I have bad anxiety and can’t work but I can bake everyone cookies 😊” and the one guy who chimed in “I have a background as a Carpenter so probably just keep my construction job” got roasted for being a conservative and capitalist in the replies. I’ll try to find it.

      Edit: sorry for the redtit link but here’s a good screencap

      https://www.reddit.com/r/twittermoment/comments/pi8asy/the_legendary_whats_your_job_on_the_leftist/

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The assumption here being that we live in scarcity? That worker productivity is directly tied to the amount of time worked? That people won’t take difficult jobs like being a doctor without the financial incentive?

            • zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which is, of course, why productivity increased when they instituted the 8 hour work day and is, of course, why Americans only average something like 3 hours of work in an 8 hour day. Because more time working means more work done. Obviously.

              It’s also, of course, why people are still starving when agricultural output easily exceeds consumption. Because of food scarcity, obviously.

              This must also explain why in Britain, notorious for underpaying doctors, becoming a doctor is still one of the most desirable occupations. Because people won’t pursue societally necessary jobs if they don’t pay well. Obviously.

          • Gorilladrums@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The assumption here being that we live in scarcity?

            This isn’t an assumption, this is objective fact, we don’t have infinite resources.

            That worker productivity is directly tied to the amount of time worked?

            It’s not 1:1, but there’s a strong correlation between productivity and time. Obviously having workers work 16 hours a day is not going to go well in terms of productivity, but a person who works 6 months of the year and a person who works 10 months of the year are not going to have the same annual productivity. The person who worked for 10 months is going to be more productive because they put in more time.

            That people won’t take difficult jobs like being a doctor without the financial incentive?

            What’s the mystery here? Money is indeed a big incentive. Why would anybody spend about 14 years of their life after high school studying very difficult subjects to work very demanding jobs if they end getting paid as much as a delivery driver? Might as well become a delivery driver and save your save a decade and a half of stress.

    • Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seeing as how in most markets you can’t exactly do what you want for a living (or even close), or acquire the skills because they’re behind a steep pay wall, and the only employment you can find is very limited in scope to what the community wants, what’s the difference? Most jobs might as well be issued in the mail.

    • aport@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      It blows my mind the people who think, “after the revolution I’m going to be a dog walker and bake dog treats!” When in reality they will probably die in a labor camp.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Person who hasn’t read a single book on communist theory explaining to the communists how they misunderstood what communism is.

        • Stuka
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Maybe if communist theory wasn’t actual fantasy more people would read it. I guess most people are more rooted in reality where communism is a shithole that doesn’t work, and communists are people you have to put up with talking at you as if you cared.

        • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is that how you plan on getting people to subscribe to your ideology?

          Do you think Christian missionaries go to a non- Christian areas and are like “Read the bible all the way through or don’t talk to me”?

          • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            People who don’t know the first thing about Christianity also shouldn’t be telling the Christians they’ve misunderstood Christianity.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not die in a labor camp, but they won’t be doing what they expected to do, or even wanted to do.

        If they don’t have any particular skill, they’ll probably end up being crop pickers or some shit because we really need those.