• FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    In my country such unions are actually mandatory and apartment buildings are collectively owned by everyone living in that building. Active union’s are amazing, my building just got a garden and a small bike shed is in the planning. The last place I lived got a whole renovation organize by the union.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No idea what that is. The direct translation to what it is is apartment union. Every resident is a member and we all vote what goes down on the general use areas of the apartment building. People who own their apartment have more leverage with their vote but people who rent have a say as well, most people in my country own an apartment though.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Is it everyone living there or everyone who owns the property there? Many countries have the 2nd type.

      If it’s the first, who pays for all the stuff?

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        The general purpose areas of the apartment building are owned by everyone who owns an apartment in the building. Renters do have a say in the decision making though.

        As for who pays: every apartment union I have been a part of we have a small apartment union charge on our utilities, usually like 10 euros at most. The amount has always been voted on. So everyone living there collectively pays.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That’s correct, but it’s not just “stop paying rent”, as that’s illegal. In general, a tenant union would either facilitate or assist with helping the tenants set up a rent escrow to be released when the problem is solved and the rent strike ends

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            Escrow or not, if the landlord doesn’t get his monies, you go living under the bridge. Problem solved.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Actually no, tenants have a right to a livable space. This includes but is not limited to running water, electricity, heating, and functional appliances. Say for example that there’s a bug problem in a building. There’s a legal process so tenants can place rent in escrow and get relocated at the cost of the landlord until the problem is solved. A tenant union assists with that process. Tenant unions often also negotiate the price of rent, to keep it affordable. To me, this sentiment is the same as “you’ll be fired for union organizing”. The chance is there, but fearmongering doesn’t help.

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Well, that’s not how it works in the UK. Once you withhold any monies, you lose all your rights and protections.

      • Ilovethebomb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        What leverage do you have though? You can’t go on strike, you’re legally obliged to pay the rent you agreed to. You can’t withdraw your labour, because you don’t do any.

        • Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          You could work with a court and do something like put it in escrow so the court can see you not paying rent isn’t just because you can’t. Instead it’s about withholding money from landlord to begin negotiations. Basically still acting in good faith but also withholding money to give you leverage. IANAL

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Double-check this for your state. For instance, in Ohio if your landlord is not keeping up on their end of maintaining the property you can go to the court and set up an escrow account with them that will hold your rent payments until ALL of the work is completed to YOUR standards, not theirs or the court’s, and they are legally barred from taking any action against you for the duration and just about anything they do afterward is immediately suspect of being viewed as “retributive action” which is illegal under the state’s renter’s rights laws. Always read your rights for your state.

        • lapommedeterre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not sure, but it’d be cool for an entire building to withhold rent for building repairs, or repairs for an individual.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sounds like it might be more like a coop. Alternatively, unionizing for the purpose of sharing information on the landlords’ practices, tenants rights, pooling money for legal help, etc.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would think that if all the tenants banded together, they could also negotiate on rent rises. I doubt they could prevent them, but they could certainly threaten to refuse to pay collectively if it was too high. Yes, that risks evicting the whole building, but that seems like a bad risk for the management company to take.

        • Ilovethebomb
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Forming a “union” and not paying rent sounds like a sure fire way to get a whole building evicted.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I said refuse to pay the rent increase. Why would they evict the building over that? Because they don’t want any rent at all?

            • Ilovethebomb
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s simply not how this works, if you don’t pay your rent, you get evicted. And yes, a landlord likely would evict an entire building full of troublemakers.

              The idea is, if you don’t like the cost of something, you go somewhere else. Why would rent be any different?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                And yes, a landlord likely would evict an entire building full of troublemakers.

                Do you have an example of a landlord evicting every tenant of a large apartment building because they banded together to oppose a rent increase?

                The idea is, if you don’t like the cost of something, you go somewhere else.

                Have you not been paying attention? There is nowhere else. Rent is ridiculously high everywhere. You free marketers are not grounded in reality.

                • Ilovethebomb
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Do you have an example of a landlord evicting every tenant of a large apartment building because they banded together to oppose a rent increase?

                  Has anyone tried this before? this entire premise just isn’t realistic, the only leverage you have over a landlord, besides knowing the rules, is taking your business elsewhere, AKA a boycott.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes it is! Tenant unions are actually steadily gaining steam in the US. When I’m done with my union campaign, I’m going to start organizing my apartment

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Excellent! I’m a homeowner, but I wish all of the renters in this country a way to get relief and this sounds like a good start!

      • Ugh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Interesting. You’re giving me ideas! Ideas that I don’t know if I have the energy and resources to act on, but something to think about and maybe talk to other neighbors about. We have no rent increase protections or really many tenent rights at all here in Oklahoma and the prices are getting ridiculous…and these are supposed to be low income apartments. Bah.

  • aulin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Y’all don’t have a national renters’ association that negotiates the rents?

      • V0uges@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        A lof of European countries do. If you rent long term, your lease is automatically renewed every 12 months and the rent increase is indexed in some consumer/ construction rate set up by the government. So no drastic increase. On the other end, if for some reason the tenant leaves and a new one arrives, the owner can set the new rent price as high as they wish in the limit of what’s authorised by the law as some metro areas have max rent prices and if you try to charge more then you’re fined.

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lol no, you just wake up one day and find out your rent is going up $500/month because a lot of people are interested

  • Ilovethebomb
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    How does going on strike work when you pay the landlord? what, exactly, is the point of the whole exercise?

  • craigers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Idk about a union… Maybe instead an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week, But all the decision of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.

  • Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t get it… Like can you say we can’t pay your rent? They own the property and can do whatever they want with it? Or is it more like making everyone act in unison so that landlords are forced to take fair rent, or no one rents their prop? I’m down for that

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or is it more like making everyone act in unison so that landlords are forced to take fair rent

      This one I think

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You ain’t done nothing if you ain’t been called a red,

      If you’ve marched or agitated then you’re bound to hear it said

      So you might as well ignore it, or love the word instead,

      Cause you ain’t been doing nothing if you ain’t been called a red!

      Source