Materialism>idealism

I’m not trying to get into a whole debate, it’s just interesting to me the way some people cling to these idealist philosophers. Same w the stoics imo. As a guy who used to read all of them… they’re useless to actually understanding life. Like it can be helpful to read them in order to understand how the Western worldview evolved, but they really shouldn’t be taken as some sort of handbook - which many seem to do. (reactionaries). People who read Nietzsche or Plato and think they have some sort of secret insight is my biggest red flag irt pseudo-intellectual who is just going to waste your time… same with Dostoevsky btw.

Confucius is based af though.

Edit: Also, yes these kinds of people exist- my former mentor/boss who spent decades at a white shoe DC law firm would accept any idea if you found a quote by Plato to justify it lmao.

  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Here’s some more of Nietzche’s cringe quotes. The guy was as reactionary a philosopher as you could get. Very surprised to see ppl defending him here.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Same. I feel like I am taking crazy pills. I knew the frankfurt school was influential on the western left but I am still surprised supposed MLs are defending him. It’s making me lose my cool a bit…

      “You just didn’t read him right” is classic bourgeois obfuscation in the academics.