Users of the Signal messaging app got hit by a hacker attack. We analyze what happened and why the attack demonstrates that Signal is reliable.

    • JonesOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh, yet another messenger that pretends that it’s the only one that can prevent MITM. Abusive marketing, or plain misunderstanding of what e2ee means? Anyway I wouldn’t trust them just for that.

      • bkrl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The code is open. You can check your own doubts.

        • JonesOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Not my point. Their webpage says that others (Signal included) are not protected against MITM (in the case of Signal, there is a note saying “if the server is compromised”). Which is plain wrong.

          • bkrl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Are you aware that, just to start somewhere, Signal asks (and needs) your phone number to make the service work? If you write “go to hell” to a person and two minutes later you regret it that person can accuse you with absolutely legal evidence in his or her favor. Is everything normal?

            • JonesOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              First, that’s completely unrelated to the very concept of MITM. Second, it also shows that you have no clue about how such protocols work (in Signal, in SimpleX, or anywhere else). I really don’t understand why people who are really into secure messengers often don’t really care about how they actually work… I mean it is damn interesting!