• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still not a criminal case. And this isn’t some kind of obscure technical point, the differences are substantial.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would you be okay if i rephrased my post as “against the law” instead of “a crime”?

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It would still be an inaccurate and unfair characterization of the USA, which is really what bothers me.

          • Melllvar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It implies that this sort of law is unique or peculiar to the USA, and it implies that the law is a bad thing.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course its a bad thing, musk isnt entitled to anyone else’s money.

              Like the shit with Targer where investors sued over lgbt support because people boycotted. Fuck this law.

              • Melllvar@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Imagine if you opened a restaurant, and I went around lying to everyone that you spit in the food. As a result, your restaurant loses business. Shouldn’t you have legal recourse to prevent me from spreading such lies about your business, and to recoup the losses you incurred?

                I don’t mean to suggest that Musk has a valid case under the law, only to point out that the law in question is actually quite reasonable and necessary.

              • paper_clip@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Suppose you were a business making, say, voting machines. It’s a good business – there are a lot of elections, they have to be tabulated, and you have a way of making that tabulation easier to do. You’re not going to be Google or Microsoft, but you’re in a comfortable niche.

                Then comes a bunch of dumbfuck conspiracy theorists who accuse you of rigging the vote against their favored candidate. You’re not happy about this, but this is just a bunch of nutjobs. To some extent, what can you do? Then this major news organization takes up what those conspiracy theorists are saying, and they’re doing this to enrich themselves by putting out news that these dumbfucks like to hear. This amplification is damaging to your business (because it’s costly to defend yourself and you’re losing business anyway), and you can prove that this major news organization is doing this on purpose, for their own profit.

                You sue that major news organization. Discovery is a delight, because these people really did know that there was no evidence for any of these conspiracy theories, but they kept repeating them over and over again, damaging your business.

                Does this sound familiar? That’s why we have laws so that victims of libel can recover some of those damages.

                Now, I’m not saying Musk is justified. Musk can go threatening to sue, etc., and I’m sure ADL lawyers would be delighted to argue before a judge to tell Musk to fuck off, since he really doesn’t have grounds to stand on.

                • blazera@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  As much as i love fox news losing money, i dont think any rich folks in Dominion have faced any real harm from the fiasco.

                  Same with pfizer over antivax nuts all the way up into federal government.

                  Now, harm over the disinformation to the general public on the other hand.