• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It implies that this sort of law is unique or peculiar to the USA, and it implies that the law is a bad thing.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course its a bad thing, musk isnt entitled to anyone else’s money.

      Like the shit with Targer where investors sued over lgbt support because people boycotted. Fuck this law.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Imagine if you opened a restaurant, and I went around lying to everyone that you spit in the food. As a result, your restaurant loses business. Shouldn’t you have legal recourse to prevent me from spreading such lies about your business, and to recoup the losses you incurred?

        I don’t mean to suggest that Musk has a valid case under the law, only to point out that the law in question is actually quite reasonable and necessary.

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mmm your example is already really common, and most of the target restaurants are the most profitable in the world.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              As a result, your restaurant loses business.

              “the most profitable in the world.”

              It just dont work the way you say it does.

              • Melllvar@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Whether the restaurant remains profitable is beside the point. If you can demonstrate that even one customer chose not to visit your restaurant as a result of my lies then I could be liable for defamation.

                • blazera@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah im the one that came in here saying it was against the law. Its a bad law. The most profitable business in the world clearly has not been harmed.

                  But it should be.

                  • Melllvar@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    As I said, I’m not suggesting that Musk’s claim is reasonable. I’m saying that the law he purports to have been harmed under is reasonable.

      • paper_clip@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Suppose you were a business making, say, voting machines. It’s a good business – there are a lot of elections, they have to be tabulated, and you have a way of making that tabulation easier to do. You’re not going to be Google or Microsoft, but you’re in a comfortable niche.

        Then comes a bunch of dumbfuck conspiracy theorists who accuse you of rigging the vote against their favored candidate. You’re not happy about this, but this is just a bunch of nutjobs. To some extent, what can you do? Then this major news organization takes up what those conspiracy theorists are saying, and they’re doing this to enrich themselves by putting out news that these dumbfucks like to hear. This amplification is damaging to your business (because it’s costly to defend yourself and you’re losing business anyway), and you can prove that this major news organization is doing this on purpose, for their own profit.

        You sue that major news organization. Discovery is a delight, because these people really did know that there was no evidence for any of these conspiracy theories, but they kept repeating them over and over again, damaging your business.

        Does this sound familiar? That’s why we have laws so that victims of libel can recover some of those damages.

        Now, I’m not saying Musk is justified. Musk can go threatening to sue, etc., and I’m sure ADL lawyers would be delighted to argue before a judge to tell Musk to fuck off, since he really doesn’t have grounds to stand on.

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As much as i love fox news losing money, i dont think any rich folks in Dominion have faced any real harm from the fiasco.

          Same with pfizer over antivax nuts all the way up into federal government.

          Now, harm over the disinformation to the general public on the other hand.