• Veraticus@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting point. But are you willing to put your theory into practice?

    If you truly believe this, you must now end all your messages with:

    “veraticus@lib.lgbt said that free-speech maximalism is for fools but I disagreed because I am a fool.”

    If you don’t do this you are suppressing my speech and censoring me. And please don’t object on the grounds that the content is, perhaps, objectionable to some; remember, objectionable content is especially worthy of free speech protections.

    • HughJanus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no idea how you got this from what I said but no, that’s not how any of this works.

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stop censoring me. I know you might find the content objectionable, but my freedom of speech demands you include that phrase in all your posts from this moment on. You aren’t going to suppress speech you don’t like or agree with, are you?

        • HughJanus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Censorship doesn’t mean refusing to repeat other people’s speech. It means preventing others from speaking. Not sure what part of this you’re not getting. It is not a difficult concept.