• argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    That would require you to disclose proof of your real-life identity to some dubious company for the purpose of unlocking porn. Definitely not privacy-preserving.

    • devils_advocate
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The company you disclose your age and online reference to doesn’t need to know how their confirmation will be used. It could be an entity already knowledgeable (DVLA, IRS).

      But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

        That is precisely the problem. It will mostly or only be used for porn.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not really. Most social media involves some rudimentary age verification, even though their age threshold is lower. Same goes for banking and interacting with government sites. Far from the only ones.

        • devils_advocate
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, mainly:

          Porn, licor, tabaco, gambling.

          But also:

          Jobs, dating, discounts, insurance etc.