• meth_dragon [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    sorry, i thought native english speakers would be more familiar with the concept of hyperbole. i will take the time to write a brief summary of relevant semantic techniques used in subsequent posts to help out the more rhetorically challenged members of our community.

    • bauhaus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      oh, so when you get caught in a lie, you just hurl insults rather than admit to it. hardly a surprise…

      • meth_dragon [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        notice how i didn’t prepend that post with a brief summary of rhetorical techniques like i said i would? that’s because i didn’t use any. ditto this post.

        • bauhaus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          are you seriously expecting a pat on the back for not being a more toxic troll than you already are? is not lying and arguing in bad faith such a difficult impulse for you to control that you think you deserve treats when you don’t do either or both?

          woooow

          • meth_dragon [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            55
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            you expressed confusion with my use of the english language and so i have adjusted my communication style to suit your apparent needs. if you feel this somehow reflects poorly on your personal character it is no fault of mine.

            the entire point of me linking the time article was to point out that it was cognitive laziness (and likely bad faith) on your part to invoke a third party ‘bias checker’ (that in all likelihood is itself biased) as some impartial mediator of reality. typically, the next logical step to take here would be to engage with the points of the articles in question and judge their merits through consensus based on verifiable fact, but it seems you got lost somewhere along the way and now you appear to be resisting attempts to shepherd you back on topic.

            • bauhaus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              you expressed confusion

              no, you lied, and when caught in your lie, you lied again and called it “hyperbole” even though it was just obviously just a lie. now you’re piling lie upon lie thinking you’re fooling anyone but yourself.

              this is just sad.

              • commiewithoutorgans [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                32
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                We all understand how exaggeration works. @meth_dragon@hexbear.net linked the article, clearly indicating it’s not the same article with the same word as the exaggeration. After that, @meth_dragon@hexbear.net was willing to be clearer, but you had already removed the thread from being about the topic of whether or not this bias indicator has any value. Now it never returned to the point being obviously initially made

                • MORTARS
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I honestly think this guy might be some kind of troll. every single exchange he has with people results in him reusing these points.

                • bauhaus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  careful you don’t sprain something with those mental gymnastics!

                  We all understand how exaggeration works

                  clearly you know how to lie badly in an attempt to cover another pile of lies, but not how to lie well enough to convince someone smart than a small woodland creature— or yourselves.

                  you know what would be impressive? if any of you could just admit you made a mistake and dropped this whole charade.

                  • commiewithoutorgans [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    23
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What more do you want than “I was exaggerating”? Once that was said, this whole BS could’ve just stopped. You then say “ok, now that we’re clear that you were exaggerating, how different are these articles?” But we never got there, because you derailed.

                    Request an edit if you really think it’s so misleading, I’m sure @meth_dragon@hexbear.net would’ve initially just edited if you were so concerned that this “lie” would mislead others. Now I doubt it, because you’ve proven to be acting in bad faith by not just accepting the explanation and continuing the initial discussion, but you had that chance.